Cable Companies as a Monopoly Research Proposal

C fit Companies as a Monopoly - Research Proposal ExampleThe root will draw on previously published reports that address the topic. These reports and articles will help define what a monopoly is as well as determining the present status of the cable companies. The paper will define the various forms of monopoly and report on current trends and legislation that affect the cable television industry. It will, when appropriate, put the issue into a historical mount to determine if the industry is moving towards a greater or lesser monopolistic hold. The paper will be written with the premise that a monopoly does not exist in the cable television market. It will present evidence of this point of view, while remaining open for the presentation of opposing viewpoints. It will shut by presenting a synopsis of the data and drawing a conclusion.In the face of rising cable bills and falling levels of service it is tempting to seek bug out a culprit and point to the cable company that has a seeming monopoly on the delivery of television viewing and broadband delivery. It is reasonable to believe that since we rent one cable coming into the house and only prevail the choice of one content provider that a monopoly exists and we are left without any consumer selection. However, that anecdotal information alone would not necessarily qualify the cable company as a monopoly. in that respect is the bidding process that takes place that determines the provider to consider. There are also suitable substitutes available that may limit the use of the word monopoly when applied to television and broadband. The cable television companies no longer have a monopolistic hold on television delivery, as they have been subjected to competition from new technologies and deregulation.When we speak of a monopoly, the classic vision is the company that has a total market share and in that respect are no competitors and no substitute products. The word is often used in a negative backgr ound as monopolies have historically had the ability to raise prices above the point that a competitive market would allow. As an example, private railroads in the past were able to act with monopolistic characteristics, as there was no competition from other transportation means. However, monopolies may also be the result of the economics of scale. If the fixed cost or startup costs are of a value that prevents others from entry, it may form a natural monopoly, where one company is able to produce and carry the service at a lower cost that having two or more companies competing for the same market share. A monopoly may also exist if there are simply no competitors that wish to enter the market, but the company does not act like a monopoly in the distribution of its services or the pricing of its goods. In addition, there is a difference between a regulated industry and a monopoly. According to Bollick (1984), because of structural conditions that exist in indisputable industries, competition between firms cannot endure and whenever these conditions exist, it is inevitable that only one firm will survive. Thus, regulation is necessary to dilute the ill-effects of the monopoly. For the purposes of this paper, a company will be considered to be a monopoly when it willfully acts to eliminate competition through its business practices and practices monopolistic pricing policies. Cable